Recalled pet food found to contain rat poison

Friday, March 23, 2007

In a press release earlier today, New York State Agriculture Commissioner Patrick Hooker, along with Dean of Cornell University’s College of Veterinary Medicine Donald F. Smith, confirmed that scientists at the New York State Food Laboratory identified Aminopterin as a toxin present in cat food samples from Menu Foods.

Menu Foods is the manufacturer of several brands of cat and dog food subject to a March 16, 2007 recall.

Aminopterin is a drug used in chemotherapy for its immunosuppressive properties and, in some areas outside the US, as a rat poison. Earlier reports stated that wheat gluten was a factor being investigated, and officials now state that the toxin would have come from Chinese wheat used in the pet food, where it is used for pest control. Investigators will not say that this is the only contaminant found in the recalled food, but knowing the identity of the toxin should assist veterinarians treating affected animals.

The Food Laboratory tested samples of cat food received from a toxicologist at the New York State Animal Health Diagnostic Center at Cornell University. The samples were found to contain the rodenticide at levels of at least 40 parts per million.

Commissioner Hooker stated, “We are pleased that the expertise of our New York State Food Laboratory was able to contribute to identifying the agent that caused numerous illnesses and deaths in dogs and cats across the nation.”

The press release suggests Aminopterin, a derivative of folic acid, can cause cancer and birth defects in humans and can cause kidney damage in dogs and cats. Aminopterin is not permitted for use in the United States.

The New York State Food Laboratory is part of the Federal Food Emergency Response Network (FERN) and as such, is capable of running a number of unique poison/toxin tests on food, including the test that identified Aminopterin.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Recalled_pet_food_found_to_contain_rat_poison&oldid=4512281”

How Your 401(k) Can Be The Best Investing Tool You’ve Ever Used

By Tony Seruga, Yolanda Seruga And Yolanda Bishop

The 401(k) tax deferred retirement savings plan was established by the US government in 1981 to allow individual investors to save money for their own retirement. Money put into a 401(k) is taken from pre-tax income, and can be matched at various levels by an employer. Furthermore, all interest earned by a 401(k) is tax deferred.

While several pieces describe how important those three advantages are, or simply tell you how important they are, we’re going to play with the numbers a bit to show you what we mean. To do this, we’ll explain a couple of investing concepts, and it’ll be handy if you have a pay stub to examine.

First, look at your pay stub from your last check. There were deductions taken out for federal income tax, and probably state income tax as well, plus FICA, Social Security and maybe a few other things as well. Take up the total of those deductions, and compare them to what you earned, pre-tax. It probably comes out at about 20 to 35% depending on your individual deduction schedules and what state you’re in, and how much you earn.

That percentage is your “tax bite” it’s how much you get bit for every paycheck. When a 401(k) or a Roth IRA is part of the picture (and a few other programs, like the HCRA), the money that’s put aside in that account is taken out before all other deductions. What that means to you is that it’s effectively multiplied by an amount equal to your tax bite.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4kM9aJOJGc[/youtube]

Let’s assume you get $1,000 as a biweekly paycheck, and your normal tax bite is about 25%; this leaves you with a post-bite income of $750. Now, let’s assume that, between your 401(k) and your HCRA, you’re putting $200 of that check away. If it came out after taxes, you’d be getting $750 minus $200, and take home $550. Coming out before taxes, the numbers come out a bit differently. $1,000 minus $200 is $800. Your tax bite of 25% means that $200 of that $800 goes to taxes, leaving you $600 to spend. Even if you decided you could live off of $600 biweekly, and put that $150 into savings directly, you’d end up with $50 less each paycheck in savings. Effectively, by putting the money into savings before it gets bitten on by the tax man, you’re multiplying it by 33% for the same take home funds.

Now, if all those numbers made your head spin, let’s review it for you: Money put away into a savings plan from pre-tax income is more valuable than money put into a savings plan done with post tax income.

The next major advantage of a 401(k) is employer matching. In many ways, this is the most impressive advantage of 401(k)s. What this means that up to a certain percentage of your salary, for every dollar you put into a 401(k), your employer will put in a matching dollar. This may not seem like much, but consider this: In investing, there’s a rule of thumb called the Rule of 72. This rule determines the amount of time it takes for an initial investment to double in value from constantly applied compound interest; to do so, take 72 and divide it by the interest rate (or rate of return) in percentage points; this tells you how many years it’ll be to double the investment if no other money is added. Thus, for a 6% rate of return, the “doubling time” is 72/6=12 years. Compare that to employer matching, which doubles your money immediately on pre-tax income, which has effectively been multiplied by anywhere from 20-33% already.

For the final benefit, money in 401(k) accounts accrues tax-deferred interest. What this means is that you don’t pay taxes on the interest as it accrues, you pay taxes on the final lump sum when the account is closed. What this does is raise the effective rate of return on your investment while the funds are accumulating by roughly 25-30%, because you won’t have to set aside a fraction of the investment income each year to pay taxes.

As a case in point, let’s assume that your average amount of money in your 401(k) account for a given year is $80,000, and it’s appreciating (increasing in value) by a healthy and respectable 8% per year. 8% of an average dollar value of $80,000 is 80,000 x 0.06 = 4,800, or $6,400. If that money weren’t in the 401(k), the $6,400 would be considered taxable investment income, which has an average tax rate of 30% combined State and Federal combined, which means you’d get $6,400 * 0.70 = 4,480 added to your balance. Instead, the full $6,400 is added, and this effectively means that your 401(k) interest rate is higher for the purposes of compound appreciation.

Now, there are drawbacks to a 401(k) first of all, you can’t touch the money, barring a hardship withdrawal before the account matures. This means that it’s NOT a fluid asset. You can’t use your 401(k) to buy a house, for example. Nor can you use it to pay for your children’s education, though there are similar plans to a 401(k) for both of those processes. If you withdraw the money before age 60, you will be socked with early withdrawal penalties that start at 10% and only get worse from there.

When you do make withdrawals on the account, you’re going to have to pay all the deferred taxes on the income and interest; this can add up to quite a substantial sum of money; only 20% of your withdrawal will be withheld by the IRS, so there’s a certain amount of accounting to do when you withdraw from your 401(k).

Finally, you have to stay with your current employer for the vesting period on your 401(k); this period ranges from 3 to 7 years depending on the 401(k) program, the size of your contribution and other factors. If you leave your employer before the vesting period is complete, a percentage of the matching contributions are refunded to your employer.

About the Author: Tony Seruga, Yolanda Seruga and Yolanda Bishop of

maverickrei.com

specialize in commercial and investment real estate. As of May, 2006, they and their partners are managing over $600 million dollars worth of new projects.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=149551&ca=Finances

Irish Finance Minister Donohoe criticises OECD’s global minimum corporate tax rate

Friday, April 23, 2021

On Tuesday, Finance Minister of Ireland Paschal Donohoe criticised talks co-ordinated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for a global minimum corporate tax rate, arguing smaller countries like Ireland “need to be able to use tax policy as a legitimate lever to compensate for the real, material and persistent advantage enjoyed by larger countries”.

Speaking to virtual attendees at a virtual seminar about international tax, Donohoe said any deal must “accommodate Ireland’s 12.5% rate”. This 12.5% rate benefits large corporations including Apple, Google and Facebook which account for one in eight jobs in the country. According to CNBC, corporate tax receipts in Ireland totalled €11.8 billion in 2020, and the Department of Finance has projected, according to The Irish Times that figure increase from €11.6 billion in 2021 to €12.5 billion by 2025.

Donohoe also said Ireland’s low taxes serve as an incentive to attract jobs and investment, saying while he supported an agreement with “appropriate and acceptable tax competition”, it must be lower than the 21% proposed by the United States.

Donohoe said nations should recognise the low tax rates present in Ireland and other small countries, citing “advantages of scale, location, resources, industrial heritage” present in larger ones. Defending his own long-established rate, Donohoe said a 12.5% rate is “within the ambit of healthy tax competition” as a rate which “stimulate[s] investment, growth and innovation, which are core to Ireland’s industrial policy”. According to The Guardian, current proposals would shrink Ireland’s corporate tax base by 20%; and tax receipts to be €2 billon lower than it would otherwise be in 2025, per Irish Department of Finance.

Brian Keegan, the director of public policy at Chartered Accountants Ireland said it was “not tax change, it’s political change”. Head of tax for the OECD Pascal Saint-Amans said “there is a new dynamic that is likely to bring us to a resolution”, and the US’ willingness to address expressed concerns simplifies an admittedly-complex blueprint.

A spokesperson for the Irish Department of Finance told CNBC on Monday “political level discussions on these issues have not yet taken place”.

The Guardian reported many companies in Ireland pay less on revenues as compared to other countries; with Apple paying as little as 0.005% in 2014. A European Commission ruling in 2016 ordered Apple to pay €13 billion it owed back taxes to the Government of Ireland ; it was struck down in July on the grounds “[t]he commission did not succeed in showing to the requisite legal standard that there was an advantage.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_Finance_Minister_Donohoe_criticises_OECD%27s_global_minimum_corporate_tax_rate&oldid=4619779”

Wikinews Shorts: December 20, 2008

A compilation of brief news reports for Saturday, December 20, 2008.

The United States government has announced that it will give US$17.4 billion in loans to help three of the nation’s automobile makers – Chrysler, General Motors, and Ford – avoid bankruptcy.

The money will be taken from the $700 billion bailout package originally intended to rescue US banks. General Motors will get $9.4 billion and Chrysler $4 billion before next year. Ford stated that it wants to get by without government aid.

President George Bush said that it would not be “a responsible course of action” to allow the companies to collapse.

Sources

  • “Bush unveils $17.4bn car bail-out” — BBC News, December 19, 2008
  • “U.S. Throws Lifeline to Detroit” — WSJ.com, December 20, 2008

Telephone and Internet communications between Asia and Europe have been disrupted after some submarine cables were severed.

The cables FLAG FEA, SMW4 and SMW3 near Alexandria, Egypt, were damaged, and the GO cable 130 kilometres off the coast of Sicily has also been reported as broken. France Telecom will repair the damage, and the company announced that it was dispatching a ship to repair the line between Egypt and Italy.

Experts warn that it could be several days before the problems are fixed.

Sources

  • “Severed cable disrupts web access” — BBC News, December 19, 2008
  • “New undersea cable cuts lead to Internet outages” — ars technica, December 20, 2008

Yann Elies, a French yachtsman participating in the Vendee Globe round-the-world solo yacht race, was rescued on Saturday by the Australian navy after the former was paralysed by a wave that struck his boat in the Southern Ocean.

Elies broke his left thighbone and perhaps several ribs after the wave slammed into his boat 200 kilometres southwest of Perth.

The Australian frigate dispatched the HMAS Arunta to rescue Elies. The ship left Fremantle early on Friday morning and reached Elies by evening.

Sources

  • “Injured yachtsman rescued by navy” — BBC News, December 20, 2008
  • “Navy reaches stricken solo sailor Yann Elies” — news.com.au, December 20, 2008

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_Shorts:_December_20,_2008&oldid=3766066”

Proposal for Buffalo, N.Y. hotel reportedly dead: parcels for sale “by owner”

Buffalo, N.Y. Hotel Proposal Controversy
Recent Developments
  • “Old deeds threaten Buffalo, NY hotel development” — Wikinews, November 21, 2006
  • “Proposal for Buffalo, N.Y. hotel reportedly dead: parcels for sale “by owner”” — Wikinews, November 16, 2006
  • “Contract to buy properties on site of Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal extended” — Wikinews, October 2, 2006
  • “Court date “as needed” for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal” — Wikinews, August 14, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal rescheduled” — Wikinews, July 26, 2006
  • “Elmwood Village Hotel proposal in Buffalo, N.Y. withdrawn” — Wikinews, July 13, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal delayed” — Wikinews, June 2, 2006
Original Story
  • “Hotel development proposal could displace Buffalo, NY business owners” — Wikinews, February 17, 2006

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Buffalo, New York —A proposed hotel that was supposed to be built at the corner of Elmwood and Forest Avenues in Buffalo, New York is apparently off the table. The former proposal was going to be called The Elmwood Village Hotel and would have consisted of 72 rooms and cost between $7 to $10 million American dollars to build.

Today several unknown individuals were seen removing a sign that was dedicated to the “Elmwood Village Gateway,” which signifies the beginning of the Elmwood Village at the formerly proposed project’s location.

Nearly an hour later the men replaced the sign with a different and unexpected sign: “For Sale: 5 commercial parcels and 1 carriage house, By: Owner.” Those 5 “parcels” are 1109-1121 Elmwood and 999 Forest Avenue, which is located in an illegal alley, according to the City of Buffalo, behind the 5 other properties on Elmwood. Hans Mobius owns all properties named in the sale.

Sam Savarino, CEO of Savarino Companies never owned the properties and has repeatadly told Wikinews in exclusive interviews that he still had a “contract to buy the properties” and on October 2, 2006 told Wikinews in an exclusive interview that he “extended” the “agreement to purchase the property[s] and will have it under contract for what we hope is a sufficient period of time.”

“He [Mobius] is undoubtedly concerned because he has lost some tenants and is a bit impatient. I think he has properly portrayed the situation,” said Savarino in an exclusive interview with Wikinews.

Savarino also says that there may be “legal issues” to work out now, before anything else can move forward, regarding the proposal.

“There are some legal complexities that must be sorted out before anything can happen there,” added Savarino.

The welcome sign was; however, not removed entirely. The sign was placed, facing the same direction of north, on the side of the Forest Plaza Art Gallery, a new art gallery located on the corner of Forest and Elmwood.

Nancy Pollina, owner of Don Apparel which was located at 1109 Elmwood, but closed on October 14, 2006 considers this a possible “victory” in regards to the lawsuit filed against the hotel to stop it from being built, alleging that several laws were broken, including not performing an Environmental Impact Study before the proposal was approved by the city, during its approval and the proposal was “rushed.” Patricia Morris, who operates Don Apparel with Pollina, Angeline Genovese and Evelyn Bencinich, owners of residences on Granger Place which abut the rear of the proposed site, Nina Freudenheim, a resident of nearby Penhurst Park, and Sandra Girage, the owner of a two-family residence on Forest Avenue less than a hundred feet from the proposed hotel’s sole entrance and exit driveway, were also plaintiffs in the lawsuit. They filed the suit with a lawyer representing them, Arthur J. Giacalone, on April 25, 2006 in New York State Supreme Court, but the case has never gone to a courtroom.

Giacalone believes that a press release issued in July regarding the project was nothing but a statement to “save face,” but that the placement of the for sale sign might be a way of convincing Savarino to speed up the sale of the properties.

“I thought all along that Savarino’s July press release might be no more than an effort to save face. But we have no way of knowing. Similarly, Mobius might have put the for-sale sign up in an attempt to pressure Savarino into closing the deal. There’s no way to tell,” said Giacalone in an exclusive interview with Wikinews.

In regards to the lawsuit, Giacalone thinks it may now be in “limbo.”

“The lawsuit still sits in limbo,” added Giacalone.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal_for_Buffalo,_N.Y._hotel_reportedly_dead:_parcels_for_sale_%22by_owner%22&oldid=1981803”

What Factors Determine Whether A Web Publisher Is Entitled To Protections In California?

What Factors Determine Whether a Web Publisher Is Entitled to Protections in California?

by

Larry Drexel

California, as well as most other states, has rules in place providing special protections for journalists. Limiting the risk of personal liability for journalists from the potentially injurious consequences of defamation lawsuits is essential to protecting true freedom of the press, explains an attorney. However, questions have arisen regarding whether such professional protections should extend to all publishers of web content, including bloggers.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijCBKQ1ARFU[/youtube]

Liability for Defamation In California, as well as in other states, the law recognizes the importance and value of a person’s good name. As such, defamation is a tort claim that provides a plaintiff with a legal remedy for damage to his or her reputation. Defamation can take the form of slander, which is an untrue and damaging claim made via spoken word, sounds, sign language or gestures. It can also take the form of libel, which is based on published statements. In order for a claim of defamation to be made, the claim or damaging statement giving rise to the lawsuit must be false, and it must be made as though it were true. The claim must also have been made to people other than the person or entity being defamed. In most cases, actual damages must be proven, although there are certain statements considered defamatory per se, which means that damages are assumed. Although defamation claims can be difficult to prove in many cases due to the difficulty of proving or quantifying damages, defamation lawsuits have, at times, put major newspapers at risk. As such, courts and legislatures have imposed certain limitations on defamation lawsuits. In a case called New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, for example, the court established a more stringent standard for public figures to claim defamation, requiring actual malice on the part of the defendant. Actual malice is a standard stipulating that the defendant must have made the harmful statements knowing they were false or with reckless disregard as to their truth. Many states also have “retraction laws” that protect a newspaper or journalist from liability for defamation unless an opportunity has first been provided to retract the false statements. For instance, under California’s retraction statute (Cal. Civ. Code section 48a), a plaintiff has a period of 20 days to make a request for retraction after discovering an allegedly defamatory statement. All requests for retraction are required to be in writing and specify which statements the plaintiff is claiming are defamatory. The request must also include a demand that a retraction be made. Upon receipt of a retraction request, a newspaper must publish a retraction within three weeks and must publish it in a manner that is “substantially as conspicuous” as the original claims. For instance, if the story was on the front page, the retraction must also be on the front page. When a defendant makes a retraction as required under the retraction laws, a plaintiff’s damages for defamation are limited to actual economic losses and do not include either punitive damages or general damages for loss of reputation. Finally, in addiction to retraction laws and tougher standards for defamation in most cases, journalists are also protected from being held in contempt of court for failure to reveal a confidential source. These protections come in the form of state laws called “shield laws.” Since the advent of the Internet, news content has increasingly been distributed online. Established news agencies, however, are not the only purveyors of information anymore: people have more access to content and greater capability to create and disseminate it, as evidenced by the proliferation of blogs. In recent years, as bloggers have been targeted with defamation lawsuits, the question has arisen as to whether they are personally entitled to the same protections from the potentially injurious consequences of such legal actions as journalists, explains an attorney. Rulings made in California courts have tended to focus more on the content and its purpose than on the author and his or her affiliations to established news organizations. The 2002 case of Condit v. National Enquirer Inc set the precedent that the state’s retraction laws protect publishers engaged in the ‘immediate dissemination of news,’ while the court, in O’Grady v. Superior Court, found that those who collect news to convey to the public are considered to be reporters and thus protected under the state’s shield laws. Given these rulings, whether or not web publishers are afforded protections under the law is dependant more on the content they disseminate to the public than their professional status.

Larry Drexel is a Public Relations manager. To obtain free, informative books or articles he suggests visiting

California personal injury attorney

.

Article Source:

What Factors Determine Whether a Web Publisher Is Entitled to Protections in California?

Wikinews interviews 2020 Melbourne Lord Mayor Candidate Wayne Tseng

This article mentions the Wikimedia Foundation, one of its projects, or people related to it. Wikinews is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thursday, October 22, 2020

2020 Melbourne Lord Mayor candidate Wayne Tseng answered some questions about his campaign for the upcoming election from Wikinews. The Lord Mayor election in the Australian city is scheduled to take place this week.

Tseng runs a firm called eTranslate, which helps software developers to make the software available to the users. In the candidate’s questionnaire, Tseng said eTranslate had led to him working with all three tiers of the government. He previously belonged to the Australian Liberal Party, but has left since then, to run for mayorship as an independent candidate.

Tseng is of Chinese descent, having moved to Australia with his parents from Vietnam. Graduated in Brisbane, Tseng received his PhD in Melbourne and has been living in the city, he told Wikinews. Tseng also formed Chinese Precinct Chamber of Commerce, an organisation responsible for many “community bond building initiatives”, the Lord Mayor candidate told Wikinews.

Tseng discussed his plans for leading Melbourne, recovering from COVID-19, and “Democracy 2.0” to ensure concerns of minorities in the city were also heard. Tseng also focused on the importance of the multi-culture aspect and talked about making Melbourne the capital of the aboriginals. Tseng also explained why he thinks Melbourne is poised to be a world city by 2030.

Tseng’s deputy Lord Mayor candidate Gricol Yang is a Commercial Banker and works for ANZ Banking Group.

Currently, Sally Capp is the Lord Mayor of Melbourne, the Victorian capital. Capp was elected as an interim Lord Mayor in mid-2018 after the former Lord Mayor Robert Doyle resigned from his position after sexual assault allegations. Doyle served as the Lord Mayor of Melbourne for almost a decade since 2008.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_interviews_2020_Melbourne_Lord_Mayor_Candidate_Wayne_Tseng&oldid=4598699”

Big 12 names players, coach of the year

Tuesday, March 7, 2006

After this weekend, Texas can celebrate not only bringing home the Big 12 Conference trophy but also having the All-Big 12 Player of the Year, P.J. Tucker, and the first recipient of the Defensive Player of the Year award, LaMarcus Aldridge.

Rival Kansas, who tied with Texas for the No. 1 slot in the conference but was denied the trophy, had coach Bill Self named Coach of the Year and Brandon Rush named Freshman of the Year. Michael Neal of Oklahoma was named Newcomer of the Year.

The All-Big 12 awards are selected by the league’s head coaches, who are not allowed to vote for their own players.

Tucker, a unanimous All-Big 12 First Team choice, is the first Longhorn to earn Big 12 Player of the Year recognition. He leads the team and ranks sixth overall in the conference in scoring (16.1), while leading the league in rebounding (9.0). He is also fourth in field goal percentage with a .531 mark. He has led UT in scoring seven times in league play and is second in the Big 12 overall with 10 double-doubles.

Aldridge wins the first defensive honor awarded by the Big 12. He is first in the Big 12 with 59 blocks overall, including 27 in conference games. He has 81 defensive rebounds in 2005-06, ranking third in the league. Aldridge can score as well, leading the Big 12 with 13 double-doubles.

Neal is the second-straight Sooner and fourth overall to win Newcomer of the Year. One of the top long-range threats in the Big 12, the junior college transfer ranks first in conference games in 3-point field goal percentage (.495) and 3-point field goals per game (3.86). He is also averaging a team-best 14.8 points in league action. He has shot 50.0 percent or better from beyond the arc 11 times this season.

Rush is the first freshman in conference history to be named to the All-Big 12 First Team. The top scoring freshman in the conference with 15.1 points per game, Rush also ranks seventh with a 6.6 rebounding average. He is the fourth KU player to surpass 400 points (408) in his freshman season. The native of Kansas City, Mo. is the second Jayhawk to win freshman accolades (Jeff Boschee, 1998-99).

Self wins his first Big 12 coaching honor and the third for a Jayhawk mentor. After returning just 21.2 percent of his scoring from a year ago, Self guided KU to a share of the Big 12 regular season championship, its sixth in league annals. Starting three freshmen and two sophomores, Kansas recorded its 18th straight season with at least 22 victories.

The All-Big 12 First, Second, Third and Honorable Mention teams were also announced, while conference coaches also selected All-Defensive and All-Rookie Teams for the first time.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Big_12_names_players,_coach_of_the_year&oldid=704899”

The Benefits Of A Hot Oil Hair Treatment

Submitted by: Salons Clear

Oil is the best key to revitalize the hair. It is a very simple and useful treatment for hair damage. Application of oil once a week or daily is considered by many as an easy way.

Hot oil treatments can help with conditions including dry scalp dandruff. Since oil and moisturizers is the key, they can condition the scalp and skin and more hair. However, hot oil treatments are a temporary solution and must be repeated regularly to maintain their current performance.

In case of serious injury or dryness of hair, a wide range of hot oil hair treatment, including micro-silicone conditioners help occurred. These products contain a self-heating Conditioner, which is at odds with the heating time and a ceiling (like a shower cap) massaged, will be absorbed into the cortex or the heart of the hair. This method requires more time and effort, and cost, but will take longer and lead to a greater degree of recovery.

So take a few moments and treat yourself, people around you and especially your locks, a luxurious hot oil treatment.

The Benefits of a Hot Oil Hair Treatment:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CkJxjNpqxk[/youtube]

Its products are used in a number of causes of hair loss. This can be minimized by treatment with hot oil.

Sometimes, the hair loses its luster due to temperature fluctuations or the use of artificial products. Hot hair treatment is very effective in restoring seems lost.

Massage your scalp with hot oil hair, blood circulation is increased. After the scalp healthy and free of dandruff.

Massage your scalp with hot oil hair is also very effective in reducing hair loss.

The new hair growth, which stimulates the thick and juicy. The use of the heat treatment oil hair is often a good way to get the hair thick and healthy.

Hot oil hair treatment, soft lead and nutrients.

The use of tea tree oil for treatment of hot oil is very good if different antiseptic properties. So this treatment is very useful for solving problems on the scalp and hair of bacteria, viruses and fungi. Hot tea tree oil treatment is very helpful in fighting dandruff and controls oily or dry scalp.

Heat the oil moisturizes the scalp circulation. This helps the scalp to breathe.

Heat treatment to increase regularly castor oil prevents hair loss and hair growth. He is one of the best oil for hair loss treatments.

Coconut oil called his treatment makes hair thick and dark and shiny.

Hot oil strengthens hair and prevents breakage or the development of split ends. Fuel oil saturates the hair and is also able to break his coat and a film that protects against damage to the environment to recover.

Another hot oil treatment is the use of rosemary oil. It is often used in aromatherapy and is perfect for them.

Hot oil hair treatment is very effective in alleviating effects of hair dye. Hair dyes contain a lot of chemicals which on continuous use can cruelly break the hair. So, regular hair oil treatment will protect the hair.

About the Author: This article has been provided courtesy of

salonsclearwater.com

. Green your beauty with natural and organic hair and skin care, skin products with Rituals Salon Clearwater. Discover your new looks with Rituals Salon an Aveda Concept Salon and Spa Clearwater.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=845992&ca=Wellness%2C+Fitness+and+Diet

Australian Budget for 2006-2007 released

Tuesday, May 9, 2006The Australian Budget (Appropriation Bill No. 1) for 2006-2007 was released by the Australian Liberal PartyAustralian National Party coalition government treasurer, Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal).

Costello noted the resilience of the economy against natural disasters and terrorism, and through “disciplined and prudent management” the Government was able to “repay Labor’s debt” of quoted 96 billion dollars of net debt and the Government was now “debt-free”.

Costello noted that the Government budget was in “surplus for the ninth time” with a forecast surplus of 10.8 billion.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Budget_for_2006-2007_released&oldid=4272798”